|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on May 30, 2008 12:08:23 GMT
Anybody fancy a WAB or WHFB game on Monday?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Mawson on May 30, 2008 12:15:53 GMT
I'd be happy to give you a game of either. I'd mildly prefer WAB as I don't get to play that so often.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on May 30, 2008 13:38:29 GMT
OK, Stephen.
What WAB armies do you have?
I've Ancient Germans, 1st Punic War Carthage, Huns, and Vikings available. My Almoravids are being rebased, so they are a non-starter.
Cheers
Mark
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Mawson on May 30, 2008 14:51:06 GMT
I have a 2nd Punic War Carthage army, mix of African Infantry and Spanish/Celtic units.
So I guess that would be either the Ancient Germans and a Hanibal gets lost and enters Germany instead of Italy scenario, or the 1st Punic Carthage and some kind of Punic/Mercenary civil war battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on May 30, 2008 16:02:07 GMT
Sort of plausible. Although Hannibal would have had to have got lost via a time machine ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Mawson on May 30, 2008 16:07:11 GMT
I'm personally not actually that bothered about historic plausibility, as long as the respective armies will work reasonably ok against each other. I shall leave it up to you as to what you want to bring.
Are we talking 1,500 points or 2,000?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on May 30, 2008 16:23:39 GMT
Shall we say 1500. You get a lot more in WAB at that size than WHFB.
|
|
|
|
Post by daveb on May 30, 2008 20:12:32 GMT
I'm personally not actually that bothered about historic plausibility, as long as the respective armies will work reasonably ok against each other. A foul heresy |
|
|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on May 30, 2008 21:54:34 GMT
The foulest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Wightman on Jun 3, 2008 11:00:05 GMT
Thanks for the game last night, Stephen. A very closely fought game. Lots of fun.
|
|
